When Employees Go Rogue: Are Employers Vicariously Liable for the Privacy Breaches of Their Employees?

Sara D.N. Babich of McCarthy Tétrault LLP has a commentary on employer liability for employee wrongdoing under Canadian law. Her analysis includes discussion of the recent UK decision in the Morrisons data breach case. Heres how Babichs article begins:

网络黑客和诈骗早已是全球集团化运作,而我们国人的信息安全意识和国外发达国家还有不少差距,不修补这些差距,同样的案子还会继续下去。
Although there has not yet been a definitive answer to this question in Canada, based on recent UK case law, it appears increasingly likely that, at least in some circumstances, the answer may be “yes”.
广告软件与免费的防病毒软件
In Various Claimants v WM Morrisons Supermarket Plc, (Rev 1) [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)(“Morrisons”), the High Court said that the supermarket chain Morrisons was vicariously liable for the actions of an employee, who leaked the payroll data of nearly 100,000 employees. The case is the first successful class action for a data breach in the UK.
More and more, Canadian courts and adjudicators have been asked to grapple with similar privacy issues, particularly in light of the privacy torts that have gained traction in some Canadian jurisdictions. Thus far, Canadian courts have not opined directly on the issue of whether vicarious liability may be extended to employers in respect of the privacy breaches of their employees, but the case law to date is consistent with a recent UK decision which holds that the test for vicarious liability of an employer for the wrongful acts of its employees is the same as it is for any other wrongful act of an employee.
Read more on CyberLex.
林子大了,什么鸟都有,为了微博上的几句驳斥文字不合心意,就有人们在现实中报复,为什么容不下异己意见呢?

猜您喜欢

李克强:加快推进政务信息系统整合共享
信息安全意识培训系统及课件
网络安全法宣传片 002 国家网络安全的现状与重要性概述
长沙一幼儿园29名孩子感染诺如病毒 园长引咎辞职
ONESAFE-APPS SUNWIZE
走向全球化,防范海外风险,要走得安全,需知晓: